COLUMBIA  LIBRARIES  OFFSITE 

HEALTH  SCIENCES  STANDARD 


HX64099881 
QP77  .T33  1 91 7     From  evolved  beginni 

RECAP 


Columbia  (Hntoenft'tp 

mtijeCitpoflrwfark 

College  of  pfjpsiicians;  anb  gmrgeon* 
Htbrarp 


ma  •*  . 


From  Evolved  Beginning 

(i.  e.  A  Hole  filling  in  with  Gastronomic  Ingredients) 

To  Involved  Endment 

(i.  e.  A  Whole  filled  out  with  Anatomic  Particulars) 


By  HENRY  DAVIDGE  THAYER 

Practician  and  Propagandist  of 

Physio-Psychic-Pronormalism 


PATHESCOPIC    PRESS 

1608  N.  18th  Street 

Philadelphia.  U.  S.  A. 
19  17 


<ap7? 


t-  ■• 


FORE  NOTE 

ALL-of-us  concretely  impart  substance  to  an  end,  posited  as  an 
absence  right  ahead,  that,  as  aimed  to,  equals  our  future,  and,  as 
apparently  arrived  to,  equals  that  area-of-our-becoming,  called :  Space. 

EACH-of-us  discretely  derive  evidence  from  a  beginning,  possessed 
as  a  pre-sense  left  behind,  that,  as  named  from,  equals  our  past,  and, 
as  ostensibly  departed  from,  equals  that  era-of-our-bypassing,  called: 
Eternity. 

The  hopeful  aim  of  ALL-of-us  to  an  unknown  end  ahead,  as  ex- 
perimentally essayed  and  hypothetically  evolved,  equals:  Life. 

The  faithful  name  of  each-op-us  from  an  unshown  beginning 
behind,  as  experientially  assayed  and  apotheotically  involved,  equals: 
Knowledge. 

Life,  equals  the  aim  of  an  experimental  essay. 

Knowledge,  equals  the  name  of  an  experiential  assay. 

The  experimental  essay  of  Life-Aims,  provides  the  means  that  the 
experiential  assay  of  Knowledge  names. 

The  experiential  assay  of  Knowledge-Names,  confides  the  mean- 
ings that  the  experimental  essay  of  Life  aims. 

Life,  equals  the  outreachment  of  expandive  pressure  to  the  end  of 
coming  to  be  the  materialized-content,  or  substance,  of  such  end,  i.e. 
coming  to  be  a  thing. 

Knowledge,  equals  the  backgraspment  of  contractive  tension  from 
the  beginning  of  passing  as  being  the  memorialized-contour,  or  evi- 
dence, of  such  beginning,  i.e.  passing  as  being  a  think. 

Life,  coming  to  be  a  thing,  comes  as  A-motion,  and  ends  as  a 
matter-of -achievement. 

Knowledge,  passing  as  being  a  think,  passes  as  E-motion,  and 
begins  as  a  memory-of -purpose. 

No  sooner  do  Life-Knowledge  contact,  than,  Life  (dammed  by 
assayive  knowledge)  comes  to  be  a  materialized  rest  at  such  point  of 
contract  and  knowledge  (vented  by  essaying  life)  passes  as  being  a 
memorialized  continuation  during  such  period  of  contact. 

Life,  equals  the  aim  of  any  congeries  of  atoms  spontaneously  di- 
rected to  the  end  of  bodying  forth  (or  materially  expressing)  an  infelt 
(valid  but  without  body)  yearning,  i.e.  an  idealized  desire  concretely 
essayed  by  all. 

Knowledge,  equals  the  name  of  any  series  of  items  simultaneously 
corrected  from  the  beginning  of  forming  back  (or  memorially  impress- 
ing) an  outseen  (void  as  without  form)  learning,  i.e.  a  realized  con- 
summation discretely  assayed  by  each. 


as 

CD 

2 

-      '  CORRECTIONS  AND  EXPLANATION        b 
-     Before  attempting  the  study  of  the  following  pages,  the  correc- 
tions indicated  below  should  be  carefully  made;  otherwise,  the  student 
will  add  confusion  to  a  task,  already  extremely  complicated,  because 
of  its  variation  both1  in  method  and  practice  from  established  courses. 

.  ",,  CORRECTIONS 

The  word  "contract,"  at  the  beginning  of  the  third  line  of  the 
thirteenth  paragraph  of  the  "Fore  Note,"  on  page  two,  should  read 
"contact."  *      .   .  .        i  : 

The  syllable  "uclaive,"  at  the  beginning  of  the  last  line  of  the 
third  paragraph  oh  page  five,  should  read  "cludive." 

;     The  word  "acquisition,"  near  the  end  of  the  first  line  of  the  fourth 
paragraph  on  page>  seven,  should  read  "acquisition." 

,     The  word  "anticaption,"  at  the  end  of  the  seventh  line  on  page 
eleven,  should  read  "anticipation." 

The  word  "fatus"  near  the  end  of  the  tenth  line  on  page  eleven, 
should  read  "faiuus" 

The  word  "Expectent,"  in  the  second  line  of  the  third  paragraph 
on  page  eleven,;  should  read  "Expectant." 

The  word  "conjectural,"  at  the  beginning  of  line  eighteen  on- 
page  twelve,  should  read  Vprojectural."    ■"_ 

The  word  "indammed,"  at  the  end  of  line,  nineteen  on  page  twelve, 
should  read  "indammedness^  - 

The  word;  "£e$e£,"  at  the  beginning  of  the  next  to  the, last  line  of 
next  to  the  last  paragraph  on  page,  sixteen,  should  read  "their."  And, 
the  word  "(EACHE),"  in  the  same  line,  should,read  "(EACH).'; 

The  word  "HOL,"  in  the  caption  line  on  page  eighteen,  should 
read  "HOLE."      :  ,     -  . 

Insert  a  connective  hyphen  between  the.  words  "think"  and 
"passing,"  in.  the  fourth,  line  of  the  fourth, paragraph  of  the  section 
titled,  "ROOT  AND  FRUIT, V  on  page  twehtyrpne.  •  .....„■ 

,  The  word  "omtogeneratively,"  in  lifre  twelve  on  page  twenty-tiyo, 
shouldL  read  "o.ntogeneratively.".  .;     ,   ....    ,!.,f  : 

The  word  "enthusiasm,"  in  the  third  line  of  the  fourth  paragraph 
on  page  twenty.three,  should  read  "enthusiastic 

Insert  "be,";. after  "comes  to,,."  in,  the  second  line  of  the  fifth 
paragraph  on.. page  .twenty-three.  w 

The  word  "hypst.atic,"  in  the  last  line  of  the  last  paragraph  on 
page  twenty-four,  sliould  read  "hypostatic." 

r  No  other  explanation,  than  that,  the  deviations  above  noted,  were 
deviations  from,  copy,  compositorially  originated  and  sanctioned  by 
printorial  proof-reading— -and,  because  of  the  lack  of  time,  on  the 
writer's  part  to  carefully  revise  the  proof  before  going  to  press,  need 
be  offered.  -  r 

To  enable  the  reader  to  make  a  clear  line  of  demarcation  between 
the  NOT-ME,  or  the  content  that  sensiblv  ingredients^  the  "cavity 
cones  of  gastronomic-intakement."  that  evolutively  culminate  as  the- 
eye-of-the-genus-homo,  and,  the  YET-ME,  or  the  contour  that  mensibly 
particularizes  the  "safety  zones  of  anatomic-outmakement."  that  invo- 
lutively    originate  .as    ihe-I-of-the-homogeneou?* ,  tjie.  ME,    must    be 


posited  and  possessed,  as  the  protomolar-skin-tension,  operating  be- 
tween the  contrapolar-air : heir-pressures,  with,  the  air-(i.  e.  flash  and 
flood) -pressure,  or  the  intending-in-pressures,  playing  the  role  of 
expending-performance,  of  A-motion,  to  which,  ME  (the  protomolar 
skin  tension),  operates  as  an  endosmosic-dam-of-perceptual-intake- 
ment;  and,  with,  the  heir-(i.  e.  flesh  and  blood) -pressure,  or  the 
extending-ex-pressure,  playing  the  role  of  impending  agent,  of 
E-motion,  which  to,  ME  (the  protomolar  skin  tension),  operates  as 
an  exosmosic-vent-of-conceptual-outmakement;  whencefrom,  the  A-mo- 
tion, that  electrically  in  its  ether-ore-weather-watt-area,  comes  to  be, 
via  ME,  as  consciously-objectified,  the  beheld-performance-that-My- 
Eye-Cone-of-vision-witnesses-as-its-Not-Me,  and,  thencefrom,  the 
E-motion,  that  electively  in  its  either-or-whether-w hat-era,  passes  as 
being,  dia  ME,  as  understandingly-subjectified,  the  byheld-agent-that- 
My-I-Zone-of-vigor-counsels-as-its-Yet-Me,  so  that,  the  NOT-ME, 
variably  comes  to  be  A-THING-OF-MULTIPLIED-COEXISTENCE- 
IN-MY-OPTIC-CONE-OF-VISION,  and  the  YET-ME,  constantly 
passes  as  being  A-THINK-OF-INCREASED-SUCCESSION-IN-MY- 
OPTIVE-ZONE-OF-VIGOR. 

The  monstrous-exhibition,  showing-off,  as  NOT-ME,  i.  e.,  that 
electrically  engendered  natural  evolution  of  objectivity,  that  ingredi- 
entally  fills  in  My-Eye-Cone-of- Vision,  the  bare  consciousness  of  which 
reveals  it  "void  as  without  form,"  or  as  matter-per-se,  i.  e.  that  uni- 
versal-thing-in-spatial-becoming, called :  My-Environment-in-general, 
and,  that  menstruous-inhibition,  known-on-  as  YET-ME,  i.  e.  that 
electively  exgendered  spiritual  involution  of  subjectivity,  that  particu- 
larizedly  fills  out  My-I-Zone-Of- Vigor,  the  mere  understanding  of 
which  reveals  it  "valid  but  without  body,"  or  as  memory-inter-alia, 
i.  e.  that  individual-think-in-eternal-bypassing,  called:  My-Functivity, 
respectively,  indicate  to  what  end,  ALL-OF-US,  aim  our  creatorial 
essay,  i.  e.  the  end  of  witnessing  our  own  universal  performance,  and, 
indicate  from  what  beginning,  EACH-OF-US,  name  our  creatural 
assay,  i.  e.  the  beginning  of  counselling  our  individual  agent — and, 
such  end  and  such  beginning,  mesoblastically  reduced  to  a  reconcilable 
mean,  that,  as  objectified,  turns  out  to  be  (epiblastically)  a  thing-void- 
as-without-form,  and,  that,  as  subjectified,  turns  in  (hypoblastically) 
as  being  a  think-valid-but-without-body,  as  so  meaned,  i.  e.  as  aimed 
to  as  an  end,  and,  as  named  from  as  a  beginning,  equals:  SELF- 
DISTINGUISHMENT,  or  the  thing,  that,  as  coming  in  by  way  of 
ME,  demands  by  its  very  effectiveness,  as  here  represented,  a  divining 
provision,  or  a  priori  cause,  and,  the  the  think,  that,  as  passing  out  by 
weigh  of  ME,  supplies,  by  its  very  motivality,  as  now  reproduced,  a 
humanized  convision,  or  a  posteriori  consequence. 

OBVERSE  PARALLELS 

A-motion  E-motion 

Haven  Art 

Essay  Assay 

Act  Faet 

Root  Fruit 

Substance  Evidence 


Spontaneous 

Come-to-be 

Progress 

Proposed 

Problem 

Preyer 

Hole 

Quo  Animo 

Sum 

Purpose 

Becoming 

All-the-same 

Consciousness 

Intellect 

Outreaching 

Growing-out 

Bodying-forth 

Apparent 

Air 

Sun 

Performer 

Counselor 

Autognosis 

Sense 

Stimulus 

Cause 

Direction 

Effect 

Contribution 

Product 

Quantum 

Nature 

Genus 

Species 

Expansion 

Gas 

Heaven 

Dausrhter-of-the-root 

Prolineal 

Pre-action 

Prescribe 

P°nless-Inkstreak 

Content 

Void-as-without-form 

Pea! -Object 

A  uto-Negation 

Euture-the-gatewav 

Bef  ore-Consummation 

A  fW-Cor  summation 

Anticipation 

Journey  Man 

Showing-off 


Simultaneous  / 

Pass-as-being 

Presence 

Composed 

Solution 

Prayer 

Whole 

Quoad  Hoc 

Mean 

Achievement 

Bypassing 

Each-an-other 

Understanding 

Conscience 

Backgrasping 

Drawing-in 

Forming-back 

A  Parent 

Heir 

Son 

Witness 

Agent 

Hypostasis 

Mense 

Animus 

Motive 

Correction 

Consequence 

Distribution 

Conduct 

Qualis 

Spirit 

Genius 

Specious 

Contraction 

Solid 

Earth 

Mother-of-the-fruit 

Collateral 

Re-action 

Describe 

Tnkless-Penstroke 

Contour 

Valid-but-without-body 

Ideal-Subject 

T4eu-Affirmation 

Pa  st-the-dateway 

After-Desire 

Before-Desire 

Participation 

Journeyman 

Knowing-on 


Matter 

Means 

Life 

Path 

Point 

Logic 

Ethnology 

Intropermeate 

Immediation 

Absence 

Ether 

Ore 

Weather 

Electric 

Watt 

Area 

Infinite 

Thing 

Endeavor 

Hypothesis 

Imagination 

Will 

Work 

Res  Gestae 

Contiguity 

Protomolar 

Recall 

Explanation 

Incubation 

Thermoanalysis 

Event 

Eve 

Experience 

Vigor 

Immortal 

Eternity 

Time 

Possession 

Iteprovement 

Apartness 

Virtue 

Bvhold    Ui 

I-Zone 

:Yet-Me 

Functionfcation 

Succession 

Involved 

Anatomy 

Tension 

Nerve 


Memory  i 

Meaning 

Knowledge 

Period 

Scope 

Aesthetics 

Ethics 

Extravasate 

Recognizance 

Pre- Sense 

Either 

Or 

Whether 

Elective 

What 

Era 

Definite/ 

Think 

Enthusiasm 

Apotheosis 

Likenation 

Judgment 

Word 

Fes  Media 

Interval 

Cortrapolar 

Initiative 

Inclination 

Excavation 

Photosynthesis 

Atom 

Adam 

Experiment 

Vision 

Indestructible 

Space 

Place 

Position 

Improvement 

Togetherness 

Power 

Behold 

Eve-Cone 

Not-Me      ■  •  •   -■' 

Environment 

Coexistence 

Evolved 

Oastrononvy 

Pressure 

Blood 


Physio-Psychic-Philosophy. 


A  AND  E  OF  M 


For  A  and  E,  the  moietal-f unctions  of  JE  (their  sum-faculty),  to 
essay  to  assay  their  A  and  E  functivities  apart  from  JE  (their  facul- 
tate  togetherness) ,  requires  that,  A  and  E,  contrary  to  their  ante- 
cedent method,  operate  away  from  instead  of  toward  JE. 

And,  as  operating  away  from  instead  of  toward  JE,  A  and  E, 
would,  by  essay  of  A  (or  All  of  JE),  ostensibly  destroy  JE,  as  the 
sum  of  their  togetherness  (or  intropermeative  apposition),  and,  as 
substitution  for  JE  (so  ostensibly  destroyed),  by  assay  of  E  (or  Each 
of  JE ) ,  would  apparently  restore  a  Not  JE,  as  the  mean  of  their  apart- 
ness (or  extravasated  opposition)  of  vocation. 

Let  JE,  to  A,  or  All,  equal  A-Hole,  that  All  gastronomically  in- 
gredient by  their  dissipating  essay,  to  the  proposed  end  of  JE's  in- 
finite progression. 

Let  JE,  from  E,  equal  A-Whole,  that  Each  anatomically  particu- 
larizes by  their  conservating  assay,  from  the  composed  beginning  of 
JE's  definite  presence. 

Hence,  as  ostensibly  destroying  JE,  A,  or  All,  as  longing  away 
from  JE  left  behind,  posit  such  ostensible  destruction,  as  the  escape 
of  All  from  A-Hole,  and  the  arrival  of  All  to  an  aimed  to  absence- 
from-JE,  that  as  so  seemingly  arrived  to,  equals  The-Not-JE,  or  the 
"apartness-from-iE-aimed-to-by-All-as-ar  riving." 

Thence,  as  apparently  restoring  JE,  E,  or  Each,  as  looking  away 
from  JE  right  behind,  possess  such  apparent  restoration,  as  the  es- 
cape of  each  from  A-Whole,  and  the  departure  of  Each  from  a  named 
from  pre-sense-of-JE,  that,  as  so  seemingly  departed  from,  equals 
The-Yet-JE,  or  the  "apartness-from-^-named-from-by-Each-as-de- 
parting." 

The  NoWE,  aimed  to  ahead  by  All,  and  bodied  forth  by  the  os- 
tensible arrival  thereat  by  All,  equals:  the  absence-from-^3,  aimedly- 
filled-in  by  the  ostensible  arrival  to  such  absence-from-^E,  of  All, 
which  absence-from-iE,  as  ever  coming  and  as  ever  there,  equals, 
Not-^2,  or  what  All  image  "apartness-from-jE"  to  be.  Not-jE,  equals 
a  point  of  anticipated  arrival,  dreamed-of -by-All. 

The  Yet- JE,  named  from  behind  by  Each,  and  formed  back  by 
the  apparent  departure  thenceduring  by  Each,  equals,  the  pre-sense- 
of- JE,  namedly-filled-out  by  the  apparent  departure  from  such  pre- 
sense-of-iE.  by  each,  which  pre-sense-of--<E,  as  ever  passing  and  as 
ever  then,  equals,  Yet--«E,  or  what  Each  likens  "apartness-from-^S" 
as  being.  YeWE,  equals  a  period  of  participating  departure,  waked- 
to-hy-Eachr 

3 


Whatsoever,  All,  dream  of  in  the  evening  of  anticipated  becoming, 
thatsoever,  Each,  wakes  to  in  the  morning  of  participating  bypassing. 
Which  "evening"  and  which  "morning,"  equal  the  morning  and  the 
evening  of  the  first  day,  and  every  other  day  since,  incident  to  the 
division-of-labor-scheme,  essayed  and  assayed  by  A  and  E,  as  indi- 
cated in  the  opening  paragraph  above. 

We  subconsciously  will  all  together  in  the  evening  of  a  dreamed- 
of-absence-ahead,  that  preposited  end,  called  future,  which  end,  equals 
the  prepossessed  beginning,  that,  superconsciously,  we  judge-each- 
apart  in  the  morning  of  a  waked-to-pre-sense-behind,  called  past. 

As  gastronomically  ingredienting  an  absence-from-& ,  All  come 
to  be  Tnatters-becoming-because-of-aimsj-imparted-to-such-an-END-by- 
All,  whencefrom,  All,  race  from  a  hole  to  aimedly  fill  in  an  absence; 
and,  as  anatomically  particularizing  a  pre-sense-of-JE,  Each  passes 
as  being  memories-bypassing-by-reason-of-names-derived-from-such-a- 
BEGiNNiNG-by-Each,  thencefrom,  Each,  traces  from  a  whole  to  named- 
ly  fill  out  a  pre-sense-of-& . 

The  absence-from-^E,  as  ingrediently  filled-in  by  the  aims  of  All 
(as  subconsciously  essayed),  may  be  a  place  filled  in  with  any  matter 
evolved  by  the  dissipating  aims  of  All  thereto,  as  say:  Wood.  Wood, 
equals  a  gastronomic  (sensible)  immediation. 

The  pre-sense-of-J3,  as  particularizedly  filled-out  by  the  names  of 
Each  (as  superconsciously  assayed),  may  be  a  time  filled  out  with  any 
memory  involved  by  the  conservated  names  of  Each  thence  during,  as 
say:  Tree.    Tree,  equals,  an  anatomical  (mensible)  recognition. 

MATTER  AND  MEMORY 

ALL-matter,  equals:  gastronomic-immediation,  with  "intellect," 
playing  the  role  of  "absence-of-^33,"  and  with  "sensible-stimulus"  (the 
ground-of-all-matter),  equal  to  the  racing-ahead-of-xiSL-to-aimedly-fiU- 
in-an-absence,  or  a  quasi-hole. 

EACH-memory,  equals:  anatomic-recognition,  with  "conscience," 
playing  the  role  of  "pre-sense-of-^E,"  and  with  "mensible-animus"  (the 
bound-of -each-memory) ,  equal  to  the  tracing-behind-of-KA.CH-to-nam- 
edly-fill-out-a-pre-sence,  or  a  quasi-whole. 

The  definition  of  "matter,"  runs  so:  Matter,  equals:  an  intel- 
lectual-hole~filled~in-with-sensible-stimulus,  or  an  absence  filled-in  with 
the  dissipating  motion  of  what  (as  willing)  aims-to-it. 

The  definition  of  "memory,"  runs  thus:  Memory,  equals:  a  con- 
scientious-whole-filled-out-with-mensible-animus,  or  a  PRE-SENSE  filled- 
out  with  the  conservated  notion  of  what  (as  judging)  names-from-it. 

Matter,  equals,  a  hole-of-absence-fiUed-in-with-statified-ingredi- 
ents,  and  objectifiedly  posited  as  a  thing. 

Memory,  equals,  a  whole-of-pre-sense-filled-out-with-ratified-par- 
ticulars,  and  subjectifiedly  possessed  as  a  think. 

The  division  of  labor,  interrogatively  initiated  as  a  proposed 
"matter-of-achievement,"  by  all,  as  exclamatorily  recalled  by  EACH,  as 
composed,  was  a  "memory-of-purpose!" 

The  fact  that  the  "memory-of-purpose"  comes  last,  has  its  unique 
obversity,  in  the  act,  whencefrom,  the  "matter-of-achievement"  passes 
first. 

4 


Now,  pile  up  your  aims  from  Amoeba  to  Anthropoid,  and  file  down 
your  names  from  onomatopaeic  concatenations  to  sylleptic  codifica- 
tions; from  simplicity  to  amplification  of  metabolic  organisms;  from 
amplifications  to  simplification  of  symbolic  canonisms;  and,  yet  back 
of  those  phalanxed  orders  of  specific  evolution,  lies  that  gastronomic 
hole,  the  filling  in  of  which,  equals  the  end  experimentally  aimed  to 
by  organic  greedy  creatorial  essayers;  and,  yet  ahead  of  these  ritual- 
ized classes  of  specious  involution,  lies  that  anatomic  whole,  the  filling 
out  of  which,  equals  the  beginning  experientially  named  from  by 
canonic  creedy  creatural  assayers. 

All  of  Us-Anatoms,  or  Wholes,  essayively  aim  (or  will)  to- 
gether, by  a  universal  experiment,  to  arrive  at  (and  to)  an  absence, 
preposited  ahead,  as,  Each  of  Us-Gastronoms,  or  Holes,  assayively 
name  (or  judge)  apart,  by  an  individual  experience,  as  departing 
during  (and  from)  a  pre-sense,  repossessed  behind. 

The  undertaking  of  A  and  E  to  operate  away  from  instead  of  to- 
ward JE,  resulted  in  A  (like  January  First)  aiming  ahead  as  im- 
mergively  filling  in  the  holelike  area  between  A  and  E  (like  to  De- 
cember Thirty-First  ahead);  and,  in  E  (Hke  December  Thirty  First) 
naming  behind  as  emergively  filling  out  the  wholelike  era  between  E 
and  A  (like  to  January  First  behind) :  with  JE,  as  the  Midnight-Point- 
and-Period  between  Dec.  31,  ult.  and  Jan.  1,  prox.  playing  the  role  of 
Hole,  as  departed  from  by  A  (or  Jan.  1,  racing  ahead  to  aimedly  fill 
in  absence-from-JE,  or  Not-iE,  and,  playing  the  role  of  Whole,  as  ar- 
rived to  by  E  (or  Dec.  31,  tracing  behind  as  namedly  filling  out  pre- 
sense-of-JE,  or  Yet-JE.  Hence,  the  maneuver,  had  no  other  result  than 
to  change  JE  from  includive-sum  of  their  apposed  vocations,  to  en- 
uclaive-mean  of  their  opposed  vocations. 

Neither  A  nor  E  have  separate  functions  despite  their  seeming 
extravasation  from  JE,  which  proves  their  (intropermeative)  inalien- 
ability; and  neither  have  they  any  intelligence  apart  from  JE  (be  it 
their  Sum  or  their  Mean),  which  proves  its  untranscendibility ;  for 
no  sooner  does  A  destroy  JE's  physical  actuality  by  departing,  than 
E  restores  JE's  psychical  f actuality  by  arriving;  and,  no  sooner  does 
E  restore  JE's  psychical  factuality  by  arriving,  than  A  destroys  JE's 
physical  actuality  by  again  departing. 

FUTILE  AIMS  AND  FATUOUS  NAMES 

Were  it  not  for  the  futile  aims  of  A  (or  All)  ethntfogically  di- 
rected to  an  impossible  future,  and,  for  the  fatuous  names  of  E  (or 
Each)  ethically  corrected  from  an  unactual  past,  the  untranscendible 
instant  of  an  inalienable  now: here  would  again  be  OURS,  having 
neither  beginning  of  days,  nor  end  of  life. 

Before  Logical-Power  (figuring  out  problems  of  infinite  progress) 
and  Aesthetic-Virtue  (lettering  in  solutions  of  definite  presence),  fig- 
ured out  an  end  other  than  infinite  progress  and  lettered  in  a  begin- 
ning other  than  definite  presence,  such  a  "thing"  as  absence  (be  it 
called  "not-here,"  "there,"  "space,"  "not-now,"  "then,"  "eternity," 
"future"  or  "past"),  was  unknown;  and  such  a  "think"  as  pre-sense 
(be  it  called  "yet-there,"  "this,"  "place,"  "yet-now,"  "is,"  "time," 
"postiquity"  or  "antiquity")  was  unshown. 

5 


Let  "thing"  designate  any-materialized-remainder-the-self-dis- 
tinguishment-of-which-equals-"  conscious-being." 

Let  "think"  define  any-memorialized-reminder-the-self-distinguish- 
ment-of-which-equals-"being-understood." 

THING  AND  THINK 

Any  "thing"  figured-out  by  Logical-Power  (i.  e.  The-Imagination), 
as  the  objectified  re-presentation  of  its  willed-essay-to-become-self-dis- 
tinguished,  shows  such  things  to  be  a-matter-integrated-by-such-dis- 
sipating-essay,  the  "self-distinguishment"  of  which,  equals  "conscious- 
being." 

Any  "think"  lettered-in  by  Aesthetic-Virtue  (i.  e.  The-Poet's-Pen), 
as  the  subjectified  re-production  of  its  judged-assay-as-become-self- 
distinguished,  knows  such  think  as  being  a-memory-particularized-by- 
such-conservating-assay,  the  "self-distinguishment"  of  which,  equals 
"being-understood." 

The  "thing"  figured-out  to  be  (re-presentatively)  the  "self-dis- 
tinguishment" of  Logical-Power,  so  gratified  Logical-Power,  that  he 
gradually  lost  sight  of  his  real  occupation  of  figuring  out  problems  of 
infinite  progression. 

And,  the  "think"  lettered  in  as  being  (re-productively)  the  "self- 
distinguishment"  of  Aesthetic-Virtue,  «o  edified  Aesthetic-Virtue,  that 
she  gradually  gained  sight  of  her  ideal  occupation  of  lettering  in 
definite  presence. 

Logical-Power  came  to  be  a  Man  of  Property  (or  treasure),  i.  e., 
the  creatorial  proprietor  of  a  creatural-organon — a  mechano-teleo- 
anatom. 

Aesthetic- Virtue  passed  as  being  a  Woman  of  Proportion  (or 
measure),  i.  e.  the  recordorial  propriety  of  a  scriptural-canon — a 
chemico-archeo-gastronom. 

As  so  divded  in  occupation,  Logical-Power,  learned  (parrotlike) 
to  repeat  the  words  of  Aesthetic-Virtue ;  and,  Aesthetic-Virtue,  yearned 
(monkeylike)  to  imitate  the  works  of  Logical- Power.  And  the  prog- 
ress of  logical-power,  consisted  of  looking  behind  for  definite  words 
by  meanings  of  which  to  express  his  infinite  impressions;  and  the 
presence  of  aesthetic-virtue,  consisted  of  longing  ahead  for  infinite 
works  by  means  of  which  to  impress  her  definite  expressions.  Which 
looking-backward  plus  longing-ahead  indicates  the  crablikeness  of  the 
mean  of  parrotlike  meanings  (or  repetitions)  and  monkeylike  means 
(or  imitations) . 

Self-Distinguishment  demands  that  no  two  things  presently  occupy 
the  same  place  except  as  exclusive  coexistence  in  space;  and,  that  no 
two  thinks  progressively  occupy  the  same  time  except-  as  includive 
succession,  in  eternity. 

Self-Distinguishment  indicates  the  alienation  of  each  from  all  and 
the  reaffiliation  of  each  with  each  by  more  and  more  complex  combi- 
nation apart  from  all. 

All  apart  from  each  equals  "absence  of  each,"  or  a  hole. 

Each  apart  from  all  equals  "pre-sense  of  all,"  or  a  whole. 


If  to  all,  the  absence-of-each,  equals  the  absence-of-wholeness, 
then  the  function  of  all  will  be  to  yearn  for  wholeness,  or  content. 

If  from  each,  the  pre-sense-of-all,  equals  the  pre-sense-of-hole- 
ness,  then  the  function  of  each  wil  be  to  yearn  for  holeness,  or  contour. 

To  holeness,  ever  a  gastronomic-function,  the  acquisition  of  whole- 
ness brings  that  sensation  of  integral  ingredientation,  called:  con- 
tent, or  elemental-treasure,  i.  e.  sensible-stimulus. 

To  wholeness,  ever  an  anatomical-function,  the  acquistion  of 
holeness  brings  that  mensation  of  segregal  particularization,  called: 
contour,  or  eventual-measure,  i.  e.  mensiBle-animus. 

In  yearning  for  wholeness,  or  for  eachness,  the  absence  of  which, 
causes  such  yearning,  Holeness,  posits  such  eachness,  anticipatorially 
re-imaged,  as  a  contrapolar  other,  the  interval  between  which  and  it, 
it  outreachingly  aims  to  bridge  by  essayive  endeavor. 

In  yearning  for  holeness,  or  for  allness,  the  pre-sense  of  which, 
motives  such  yearning,  Wholeness,  possesses  such  allness,  partici- 
patorially  re-likenessed,  as  a  protomolar  other,  the  contiguity  between 
which  and  it,  as  attending,  it  backgraspingly  names,  by  assayive 
enthusiasm. 

ALLNESS  AND  EACHNESS 

Thus,  allness  (self -distinguished)  posits  eachness  (self -distin- 
guished) as  its  contrapolar  other,  or  as  a  contingency  ahead,  the 
interval  between  which  and  it,  it  aims  to  bridge  by  vigorous  endeavor. 

And,  so,  eachness  (self -distinguished)  possesses  allness  (self-dis- 
tinguished) as  its  protomolar  other,  or  as  an  inevitability  behind,  the 
contiguity  between  which  and  it,  as  attending,  it  names  by  visional 
enthusiasm. 

And  since  eachness  and  allness  are  inalienable,  the  operation 
above  described,  stands  manifestly  out  as  an  operation  of  pure  insan- 
ity, the  sole  ground  and  bound  of  which  idiotic  performance,  lies  in 
the  Notion-of-Self-Distinguishment,  by  means  and  by  meaning  of 
which  notion,  each  and^all  (otherwise  inalienable)  have,  as  essayively 
aimed  by  all  and  as  assayively  named  by  each,  built  up  and  main- 
tained a  res  media  between  all  and  each,  as  intervalled  extremes,  that, 
for  metabolic  creaturization,  or  seekers  after  gastronomic  content- 
ment ;  and  built  up  and  maintained  a  res  gestae  between  each  and  all, 
as  contiguous  confluences,  that,  for  symbolic  scripturization,  or  seekers 
after  anatomic  contouration,  parallel  each  other  at  extremity  and 
during  confluence  in  infatuated  perpetuity. 

All  our  aims  are  experimentally  initiated  to  an  end,  i.  e.  a  matter 
of  achievement,  inclined  to  as  an  absence  ahead,  pre-known  by  name, 
or  mensible  contour. 

Each  our  names  are  experientially  recalled  from  a  beginning, 
i.  e.  a  memory  of  purpose,  explained  from  as  a  pre-sense  behind,  pre- 
shown  by  aim,  or  sensible  content. 

Every  end,  as  aimed  to,  must  be  known  by  some  designation,  or 
name,  at  the  time  when  the  experimentally  initiated  aim  begins,  which 
name,  in  that  eventuality,  equals  the  end  posited  by  "being  understood" 
antecedently. 


Each  beginning,  as  named  from,  must  be  shown  by  some  defi- 
nition, or  aim,  at  the  place  where  the  experientially  recalled  name 
ends,  which  aim,  in  that  elementality,  equals  the  beginning  possessed 
by  "conscious  being"  subsequently. 

Intelligence,  in  its  totality,  consists  of  the  inalienable  relation  of 
aim  and  name;  and,  intelligence,  as  an  act," consists  of  aiming  a  name; 
and,  intelligence,  as  a  fact,  consists  of  naming  an  aim. 

Aiming  a  name,  equals,  to  experimentally  (or  by  act  of  will,  or 
"conscious-being"),  aim  an  experientially  (pre-known)  name,  i.  e.  a 
designated-end. 

Naming  an  aim,  equals  to  experientially  (or  by  fact  of  judgment, 
or  "being-understood") ,  name  an  experimentally  (pre-shown)  aim,  i.  e. 
a  definited  beginning. 

Now,  the  aim  of  All  (from  a  beginning  to  a  pre-designated  end) 
was  self-distinguishment  coming  to  be;  and,  here,  the  name  of  each 
(to  an  end  from  a  pre-definite  beginning),  was  self-distinguishment 
passing  as  being. 

But,  as  the  aim,  was  actually  an  experiment  directed  to  an 
unknown  end,  as  aimed  to,  and  from  a  pre-known  yearning,  as  aimed 
from;  and,  as  the  name,  was  factually  an  experience  corrected  by  a 
pre-shown  beginning,  as  named  from,  and  with  an  unshown  learning, 
as  named  with:  the  experiment  no  more  could  transcend  its  primitive 
experimentality,  as  aimed,  despite  its  materialized  realization  at  aimed 
to  points,  than  the  experience  could  transcend  its  latest  experientiality, 
as  named,  despite  its  memorialized  idealizations  during  named  from 
periods — for,  since,  the  thing  anticipated  by  all  (as  experimentally 
aimed  to  ahead  in  time),  and,  the  think  participated  in  by  each)  as 
experientially  named  from  behind  in  place),  was  the  same  ens,  to  wit: 
Self-distinguishment,  neither  its  absence  ahead,  as  aimed  to,  nor,  its 
pre-sense  behind,  as  named  from,  could  be  other  than  the  same  refer- 
endum, in  one  aspect,  posited  by  all  as  the  parallaxal  interval  between 
all  and  the  "absence-of-each,"  and  possessed  by  each  as  the  introllaxal 
contiguity  between  each  and  the  "pre-sense-of-all." 

IMPROVEMENT  AND  REPROVEMENT 

Physio-Psychic-Pronormalism,  divides  every  Ens,  into  (a)  An-End 
(contingently  posited  as  a  possibility  in  becoming) ;  and  (b)  A-Be- 
ginning  (actually  possessed  as  an  inevitability  in  bypassing) . 

Let  an-end  equal  a  point  (experimentally)  aimed  to  by  that  that 
begins. 

Let  a-beginning  equal  a  period  (experientially)  named  from  by 
that  that  ends. 

Let  that  that  begins  equal  an  universal  purpose  (i.  e.  the  logical 
power  of  a  proposed  problem) ;  and,  let  that  that  ends  equal  an  indi- 
vidual achievement  (i.  e.  the  aesthetic  virtue  of  a  composed  solution). 

As  interoperants,  that  that  aims  to  an  end  and  that  that  names 
from  a  beginning,  equal  respectively,  the  universal-all-togetherness 
and  the  individual-each-apartness  operating  between  such  end  and 
such  beginning.  .■......'. 


Such  beginning  and  such  end  equal  the  untranscendible  paren- 
thesis of  the  inalienable  aimer  that  posits  the  end  of  such  parenthesis 
as  the  point  of  its  problematical  emancipation  and  the  inalienable 
namer  that  possesses  the  beginning  of  such  parenthesis  as  the  period 
of  its  solutional  incarceration. 

The  end  aimed  to  by  the  logical  power  of  the  universal-all-togeth- 
erness was  a  point  of  infinite  progression,  to  which  prognosively,  as 
by  a  spirit  of  anticipatorial  hypothesis,  all  wended  all  its  way. 

And,  the  beginning  named  from  by  the  aesthetic  virtue  of  the 
individual-each-apartness  was  a  period  of  definite  presence,  from 
which  diagnosively,  as  by  the  nature  of  participatorial  apotheosis,  each 
mended  each  its  way. 

The  end,  so  directly  aimed  to,  was  a  haven  point  of  anticipated 
improvement,  i.  e.  a  heaven. 

The  beginning,  so  correctively  named  from,  was  an  art  period  of 
participated  reprovement,  i.  e.  an  earth. 

The  end  that  never  ended,  was  in  such  aspect,  a  point  of  infinite 
progression,  to  which  all  universally  aimed  together;  the  intent  of 
which  was  the  longed-for  improvement  of  all. 

The  beginning  that  never  begun,  was  in  such  aspect,  a  period  of 
definite  presence,  from  which  each  individually  named  apart,  the 
extent  of  which  was  the  looked-for  re-provement  of  each. 

For,  certainly,  unless  each  was  re-proved  from  the  beginning,  the 
improvement  of  all  at  the  end,  were  impossible. 

For,  how  could  aught  essayively  come  to  be  improved,  unless  such 
improvement  involved  an  antecedent  assayive  reprovement? 

And  likewise,  how  could  aught  assayively  pass  as  being  reproved, 
unless  such  reprovement  evolved  a  subsequent  essayive  improvement? 

As  interoperantly,  universally  improved  at  the  havenward  end 
of  their  untranscendible  parenthesis,  and,  individually  reproved  during 
the  artlike  beginning  of  their  untranscendible  parenthesis,  the  inalien- 
able pair,  wended  their  universal  ways  to  the  boundless  improvement 
of  an  infinite  progression,  and,  mended  jtheir  individual  ways  from 
the  groundless  reprovement  of  a  definite  presence. 

Now,  imagine  that  inalienable  pair,  ostensibly  essaying  and  appar- 
ently assaying,  no  longer  their  untranscendible  unity  of  vocation,  and, 
liken  that  inalienable  pair,  so  essaying  and  so  assaying,  to  become  to 
be  and  to  bypass  as  being.  Self -Distinguished  (together  apart)  from 
their  untranscendible  unity,  or,  as  a  divided  vocation  (despite  their 
inalienability),  transcending  (despite  its  untranscendibility) ,  their 
ultra-includive  parenthesis,  and,  then,  you  have  (as  essayed)  an 
account  of  the  essay  recorded  in  first  genesis;  and,  there,  you  have 
(as  assayed)  the  account  of  the  assay  recorded  in  second  genesis, 
et  sequa. 

And,  as  syntheticized  to  its  latest  presiduum,  and,  as  analyzed 
from  its  earliest  residuum,  the  presiduum  so  evolved  and  the  residuum 
so  involved,  equal  me,  that  all,  that  My-I  subjectively  feels,  as  untran- 
scendible unity  in  succession,  and,  they  each,  that  My-Eye  objectively 
sees,  as  inalienable  parity  in  coexistence. 


RENASCENT  BECOMING  AND  PREMORTEM  BYPASSING 

To  begin  with  (as  renascently  becoming),  we  consciously  find 
ourselves  materially  equipped  (because  of  a  priori  foresight)  with 
organic-means;  the  intuitive  (outreaching)  nature  of  which,  cate- 
gorically predicts  the  evolving  (stimulussed)  ends,  to  which  (intel- 
lectually) our  dissipating  (expiring)  lives  will  be  directly  aimed. 

To  end  with  (as  premortemly  bypassing),  we  understanding^ 
find  ourselves  memorially  equipped  (by  reason  of  a  posteriori  hind- 
sight) with  canonic-meanings;  the  innate  (backgrasping)  spirit  of 
which,  dogmatically  indicates  the  involved  (animussed)  beginnings, 
from  which  (conscientiously)  our  conservated  (inspired)  knowledges 
have  been  correctively  named. 

Our  beginnings  directed  to  an  end,  despite  their  universallized 
amplitude  (coexistently  expressed),  antiquate  back  all  their  plural 
achievements  to  a  singular  purpose,  that  accounts,  root  et  sequa,  for 
all  their  renascent  becoming,  the  nature  of  which,  in  all  its  works, 
reveals  a  Logical-Power,  i.  e.  explicitly  designated:  Power-of-The- 
Eoot,  or  The-Origin-(in  perpetuum)  -of -Life. 

Our  endings  corrected  from  a  beginning,  despite  their  individu- 
alized simplitude  (successively  impressed),  futurize  ahead  each  their 
singular  purpose  from  a  plural  achievement,  that  accounts,  fruit  et 
infra,  for  each  their  premortem  bypassing,  the  spirit  of  which  in  each 
its  words,  conceals  an  Aesthetic- Virtue,  i.  e.  implicitly  defined :  Virtue- 
of-The-Fruit,  or  The-Ultimate-  (in  perpetuum)  -of '-Knowledge. 

Our  beginnings  and  ends,  therefore,  respectively,  refer,  as  becom- 
ing, and  relate,  as  bypassing,  to  the  works  of  a  Logical-Power,  and, 
to  the  words  of  an  Aesthetic- Virtue,  operating  in  two  distinct  spheres, 
i*  e.  the  former,  in  the  area  of  an  amplifying  outreachment ;  the  latter, 
in  the  era  of  a  simplified  backgraspment,  clearly  distinctified  as  to 
separatedness  of  vocation,  but  plainly  coalescent  in  the  media-gestae, 
or  the  ibid  in  common  of  their  (otherwise)  separate  vocations,  and, 
which,  in  both  the  spheres  of  their  (separate)  vocations,  and,  which, 
as,  the  ibid  in  common  of  their  (otherwise)  separate  vocations,  equals: 
Self-Dis  tinguishment. 

Self-Distinguishment,  as  a  res  media  repels  them  apart  in  (gas- 
tronomical)  divorcement,  and,  as  a  res  gestae  attracts  them  together 
in  (anatomical)  conjugation. 

Hence,  the  end,  at  which  the  beginning  of  Creation  aimed,  and,  the 
beginning,  during  which  the  end  of  Creation  named,  was,  as  willed  by 
The-Logical-Power,  and,  as  judged  by  The-Aesthetic- Virtue,  was  (gas- 
tronomical)    (anatomical)    Self-Distinguishment. 

Hence,  previous  to  such  essay  and  previous  to  such  assay,  neither 
the  essayer  nor  the  assayer,  was  self-distinguished,  else  why  the 
essay  and  the  assay?  Hence,  intro-homogeneity  of  vocation,  and  not 
extra-specification  of  vocation,  characterized  the  functional  operations 
of  The-Logical-Power  and  The-Aesthetic- Virtue. 

Self-Distinguishment,  was  therefore,  as  Unknown,  as  futured,  by 
the  essayer  thereto,  because  of  an  anticipatorial  yearning  logically 
aimed  at  and  objectifiedly  becoming,  as,  Self-Distinguishment,  was 
Unshown,  as  antiquated,  by  the  assayer  thereof  by  reason  of  a  par- 

10 


ticipatorial  learning  aesthetically  named  <hu  *ag  its  subjectified  by- 
passing. 

To  The-Logical-Power,  that  essayed  to  realize  its  objectified- 
unknownness,  because  of  the  hope  engendered  by  his  infelt  and  out- 
imaged  yearning,  in  both  aspects,  "an  absence,"  Self-Distinguishment, 
was  a  thing-of-preposited-becoming,  to  which  The-Logical-Power  out- 
reachingly  raced  along,  as  sensibly  filled  with  the  spirit-of-anticaption, 
and,  as  bridging  the  interval  between  the  extremes  of  his  expiring  aim 
and  his  materializing  object,  brought  him  closer  and  closer  to  that 
ever  becoming,  and  never  arrived  to,  ignis  fatus,  called:  Futurity. 

To  The- Aesthetic- Virtue,  that  assayed  to  idealize  its  subjectified- 
unshownness,  by  reason  of  the  faith  engendered  by  her  outseen  and 
inliknessed  learning,  in  both  aspects,  "a  pre-sense,"  Self-Distinguish- 
ment, was  a  think-of-prepossessed-bypassing,  from  which,  The-Aes- 
thetic-Virtue  backgraspingly  traced  around,  as  mensibly  filled  with 
the  nature-of -participation,  and,  as  attending  the  contiguity  between 
the  confluences  of  her  inspiring  name  and  her  memorialized  subject, 
took  her  further  and  further  from  that  ever  bypassing,  and,  never 
departed  from,  lignus  vitae,  called:  Antiquity. 

Hence,  Self-Distinguishment,  as  essayively  aimed  to,  as  a  Thing- 
of-preposited-becoming,  was  the  Heir-Expectent,  that  was,  at  his  com- 
ing, to  fill  in  the  stadium  of  space,  or  "absence-ahead,"  with  all  man- 
ner of  mighteous-works,  that,  beheld  by  the  (all  seeing)  eye  of  the 
father,  as  evolved  by  his  expiring-essay,  equal,  the  reflection  of  all 
his  works,  or  the  photo sythetized-image  of  all  his  works,  in  which,  as 
in  a  dissolving  vision,  he,  as  expiring  ancestor  would  witness  the  evo- 
lution of  his  own  posteritorial-otherness,  to  wit:  his  universal  self- 
distinguishment. 

Thence,  Self-Distinguishment,  as  assayively  named  from,  as,  a 
Think-of-prepossessed-bypassing,  was  the  Heir-Apparent,  that  was, 
during  its  passing,  to  fill  out  the  radius  of  eternity,  or  "pre-sense- 
behind,"  with  each  manner  of  righteous-words,  that,  byheld  by  the 
(each  feeling)  I  of  the  mother,  as  involved  by  her  inspiring-assay, 
equals  the  reflection  of  each  her  words,  or  the  thermoanalytical- 
likeness  of  each  her  words,  in  which,  as  in  a  resolved  vigor,  she,  as 
inspired  posteritor  could  witness  the  involution  of  her  own  ancestral- 
otherness,  to  wit:  her  individual-self -distinguishment. 

The  future  of  self-distinguishment,  as  materially  evolved  by  the 
expiring-essay  of  its  logical-progenitor;  and,  the  antiquity  of  self- 
distinguishment,  as  memorially  involved  by  the  inspiring-assay  of  its 
aesthetic-progenitor,  gave  to  such  self-distinguishment,  large  assets, 
from  his  paternal  side,  and,  vast  liabilities,  from  his  maternal  side; 
in  the  paternal  area,  equalling:  Intellectual-Treasures-of-Infinite- 
awaredness-as-regards-effectualized-immediacy;  in  the  maternal  era, 
equalling:  Conscientious-Measures-of-Definite-bewaredness-as-regards- 
consequentialized-recognizances. 

Thus,  Logical-Power  and  Aesthetic-Virtue,  primordially,  the  in- 
alienable-functions of  an  untranscendible-faculty,  i.  e.  that  Intelligent- 
Genius,  of  their  intropermeative  begetment,  whose  infinite  path  was 
progress  and  whose  definite  scope  was  presence,  by  their  seeking  after 

11 


self-distinguishment  (or  the  impossible  in  view  of  their  inalienability) 
and,  the  unactual  (in  view  of  its  untranscendibility),  found  their 
inalienable  vocations,  ostensibly  changed  to  Rational-Will  and  Ethical- 
Judgment,  or  as  the  bifurcated  creators  of  an  implacable  media-gestae, 
to  wit :  that  Ambidexter-Genus,  of  their  extra vasated-begetment,  whose 

})ath  lies  chimerically-a-head,  as  an  unknown-future,  and,  whose  scope 
ies  mendaciously -behind,  as  an  unshown-antiquity. 

In  its  ambidextrous  operation,  the  implacable  media-gestae,  via 
which  they  achieve,  as  Quixotically  essayed  by  Logical-Power,  alias 
Rational- Will,  and,  purpose,  as  Sanhedrally  assayed  by  Aesthetic-Vir- 
tue, alias  Ethical-Judgment,  equals  A  lens;  on  the  posterior  side  of 
which,  and  through  which  lens,  as  through  a  vent,  Rational-Will  pro- 
jectures  experimentally  what  it  imaginatively  posits  self-distinguish- 
ment to  be;  and,  on  the  anterior  side  of  which,  and  beyond  which,  as 
beyond  a  dam,  Ethical- Judgment  conjectures  experientially  what  it 
likenatively  possesses  self-distinguishment  as  being;  whencefrom,  such 
lens,  or  the  media-gestae  phase  of  self-distinguishment,  as  feeling  such 
conjectural  outventing  through  it,  feels  an  inward  outpassing  vigor; 
and,  thencefrom,  such  lens,  as  seeing  such  conjectured  indammed 
beyond  it,  sees  an  outward  incoming  vision. 

VISION  AND  VIGOR 

As  so  outwardly  conscious  of  an  external  vision  and  so  inwardly 
understanding  an  internal  vigor,  our  res  medial  lens,  thus,  evolved 
and  involved,  rises  to  the  Ultima  Thule  of  self-distinguishment,  via: 
The-Res-Gestael-Gens,  or  that  which  perceptually  seizes  the  species  of 
the  vision  and  makes  them  out  to  be  a  phylospecificated  otherness 
coexistently  photosynthetized ;  and,  that  conceptually  seizes  the  indi- 
viduals of  its  vigor  and  makes  them  in  to  be  an  ontogenerated  oneness 
succesionally  thermoanalyzed ;  or,  in  one  side,  equal  to  My-Gastro- 
nomical-Hole  filling  in  with  materialized  (i.  e.  immediated)  means, 
and,  in  the  other  side,  equal  to  My-Anatomical- Whole  filling  out  with 
memorialized  (i.  e.  recognized)  meanings. 

That  outside  envisioned,  equals:  Not-Me,  and,  this  inside  envig- 
ored,  equals:   Yet-Me. 

My-Eye  sees  many  (or  all)  coexistently  posited  as  an  objectified- 
Not-Me;  My-I  feels  one  (or  each)  succesionally  possessed  as  a  sub- 
jectified Yet-Me. 

Via  My-Eye,  The-Logical-Power,  beholds  its  self-distinguishment 
coexistently  reflected  back  as  an  Universal-Thing-in-becoming;  via 
My-I,  The-Aesthetic-Virtue,  byholds  its  self-distinguishment  succes- 
ionally reflecting  ahead  as  an  Individual-Think-in-bypassing. 

INTERVAL  AND  CONTIGUITY 

The  substitution,  or  the  attempt  to  substitute,  an  "interval"  for  a 
"contiguity,"  by  The-Logical-Power  and  The-Aesthetic-Virtue  moieties 
of  an  inalienable-parenthood,  the  untranscendible  product  of  which 
inalienable-parenthood,  was  Their-Child;  or  the  substitution  of  a  "bi- 
sexual-contrapolarity"  for  a  "unisexual-homogeneity,"  as  an  extra- 
mode  of  procreation,  was,  really,  as  essayed  by  such  homogeneous- 

12 


hood,  nothing  other  than  the  attempt  of  such  inalienable-parents  to 
self -distinguish  each  their  own-solus-use  contradistinctively  from  their 
one-holos-ooze,  or  that  untranscendible  product  of  their  inalienable- 
parenthood,  called :  Their-child,  the  intelligent-genius,  of  which,  as  the 
"gray-matter"  that  facultatively  presided  over  (as  the  sum  product 
of)  the  factoral  contributions  of  The-Logical-Power  and  The-Aesthetic- 
Virtue,  that  parentally  resided  within  its  (and  their)  constituted 
integrity,  despite  their  conspiracy  to  dethrone  its  genius,  and,  in  lieu 
therefor,  substitute  that  stultifying  "genus,"  via  which,  ever  since, 
they,  as  in  one  way  self-distinguished  by  a  blind-will-in-earthly-evo- 
lution-of-natural-organs,  and,  in  another  way  self-distinguished,  by 
a  cold-judgment-in-heavenly-involution-of -spiritual-canons,  have,  os- 
tensibly as  essayed  and  apparently  as  assayed  maintained  their  own- 
functional-uses  apart  from  each  other;  of  which  I  John  6:7  recites: 
"For  there  are  three  that  bear  record  in  heaven  .  .  .  And  these 
three  are  one.  .  .  .  And  there  are  three  that  bear  witness  on 
earth     .      .      .     And  these  three  agree  as  one." 

Whencefrom,  since,  the  three  that  assay  (bear  record  quo  animo) 
as  one  in  heaven,  and,  since,  the  three  that  essay  (bear  witness  quoad 
hoc)  as  one  on  earth,  are  The-S'ame-One,  operating  as  a  divided  labor 
the  onus  of  which  equals  Self-Distinguishment,  what  shall  we  conclude? 

// — subconsciously — by  an  experimental  aim  universally  essayed 
by-ALL-of-us-( atoms) -tog ether — we  atoms,  concretely  direct  all-our- 
motion  to  (and  at)  a  point-of -infinite-progression  (ever  posited  as 
an  area  of  holelike  absence  ahead) — and — if — superconsciously — by  an 
experiential  name  individually  assayed  by  each-o/-us- (items) -apart 
— WE  items,  discretely  correct  each-our-motion  from  (and  during) 
a  period-of-definite-presence  (ever  possessed  as  an  era  of  wholelike 
pre-sense-behind) — there,  as  yearned  and  aimed  to  by  all  of  us 
(atoms)  together,  such  point-of-infinite-progression,  could  equal  the 
fixed-point  in  the  constellation  of  Hercules,  to  which,  we-atoms,  in 
our  role  of  Solar-System,  as  to  an  end  that  ends  not,  all-together 
concretely  wend  our  universal  (A) -motion — and — then,  as  purposed 
and  filled-in  by  all  of  us  (atoms)  together,  such  area-of -holelike- 
absence-ahead,  would  equal  The-Space,  through  and  within  which, 
we-atoms,  in  our  role  of  Solar-System,  as  at  an  end  that  ends 
not,  all-together  directively,  by  our  dissipating  (A) -motion,  ingredient 
(in  so  far,  as  we-atoms,  coexistently  come  to  be  the  substance  of  the 
ends  (or  things),  that,  all-together,  we  materializedly  body  forth-) 
— and — here,  as  learned  and  named  from  by  each  of  us  (items) 
apart,  such  period-of-definite-presence,  would  equal  a  free-period  in 
the  configuration  of  ME,  from  which  we-items,  in  our  role  of  Molar- 
System,  as  from  a  beginning  that  begins  yet,  each-apart  discretely 
mend  our  individual  (E) -motion — and — now,  as  achieved  and  filled- 
out  by  each  of  us  (items)  apart,  such  era-of-wholelike-pre-sense-be- 
hind,  beyond  and  without  which,  we-items,  in  our  role  of  Molar- 
System,  as  during  a  beginning  that  begins  yet,  each-apart  correct- 
ively, by  our  conservated  (E) -motion,  particularize  (in  so  far,  as, 
we-items,  successionally  pass  as  being  the  beginners  (or;  thinks), 
that,  each-apart,  we  memorializedly  form  back. 

13 


Thus,  we-atoms,  all  together  constitute  the  universal  substance 
of  the-things,  that,  as  concretely  willed  by  us-atoms  (through  the 
area  of  our  holelike  notness)  come  to  be; — and,  so,  we-items,  each 
apart  institute  the  individual  evidence  of  the-thinks,  that,  as  dis- 
cretely judged  by  us-items  (beyond  the  era  of  our  wholelike  yetness), 
pass  as  being. 

REALISM  AND  IDEALISM 

Philosophy,  ranges  from  the  Realism  of  thing  s-that-come-to-bt 
(i.  e.  Becoming,  sensibly  materialized),  to  the  Idealism  of  thinks-that* 
Pass-as-being  (i.  e.  Bypassing,  mensibly  memorialized) — the#  formeT 
equalling  a  philosophy  of  our  all-togetherness  as  an  infinite-  pro- 
gression to  an  end  that  ends  not;  and  the  latter  equalling  a  philosophy 
of  our  each-apartness  as  a  definite-presence  from  a  beginning  thai 
hegins  yet. 

The  mystery  of  the-end,  that  comes  to  be  not,  as  realized  (ot 
Universally  evolved),  by  the  dissipating  (A)-motion  of  all-together 
directed  to  a  point  of  absence  ahead,  at  which  end,  a.s  ostensibly 
arrived  to,  the  racing  (A) -motion  negates  all-together  its  motion 
and  rests  as  a  thing  in  remainder,  called  "a  matter  filling  in  a  hole- 
tike  absence,"  no  longer  mystifies  me — and,  the  mastery  of  the- 
BEGinning,  that  passes  as  being  yet,  as  idealized  (or  individually 
involved),  by  the  conservating  (E)-motion  of  each-apart  corrected 
from  a  period  of  pre-sense  behind,  during  which  beginning  appar- 
ently departed  from,  the  tracing  (E) -motion  affirms  each-apart  its 
motion  and  continues  as  a  think  in  reminder,  called  "a  memory  filling 
Gut  a  wholelike  pre-sense,"  no  longer  masters  ME. 

As  all-together,  we  atoms  ainr  as  one  to  an  end  that  ends  not, 
i.  e.  to  an  infinite  progression. 

As  each-apart,  we  items  name  as  many  from  a  beginning  that 
(begins  yet,  i.  e.  from  a  definite  presence. 

Were  The-Inalienable-Factors  of  Their-Untanscendible-Sum,  as 
respectively,  ALL-together,  The-Atoms,  that  such  sum  contains,  and, 
EACH-apart,  The-Items,  that  such  sum  contours,  to  prognosively  aim 
all-together  and  diagnosively  name  each-apart  all-and-each  their  own- 
£actoral-use  away  from  such  sum,  they  all  hypothetically,  would  essay 
to  alienate  their  inalienability  (as  its  factors),  and,  they  each,  apo- 
CJieotically,  would  assay  as  transcending  its  untranscendibility  (as 
their  sum). 

And,  no  sooner  would  they  (all-together)  essay  away  from  such 
£um,  than,  It,  logically  abandoned  by  its  arterial-substance,  would  race 
after  them  to  gastronomically  retake  them,  as  a  hole  might  yearn  and 
aim  to  retake  its  lost  ingredients;  and,  no  sooner  would  they  (each- 
apart)  assay  away  from  such  sum,  than^JEt,  aesthetically  restored  by 
its  veinal-evidence,  would  trace  before  £hem  to  anatomically  remake 
fhem,  as  a  whole  might  name  and  learn  to  remake  its  found  par- 
ticulars. 

As  retaking  its  lost  ingredients  gastronomically,  their  Sum-Hole 
ftpmes  to  be  A-Matter-of -achievement,  i.  e.  ever  a  hole  (thing)  con- 
fining ingredients  (or  means)  retaken  in. 

As   remaking   its   found   particulars   anatomically,   their   Sum- 

14 


Whole  passes  as  being  A-Memory -of -purpose,  i.  e.  ever  a  whole  (think) 
contouring  particulars  (or  meanings)  remade  out. 

Every  material-thing  equals  a-gastronomic-hole-filled^in-with-re- 
taken-ingredients,  the  hole  of  which  equals  an  autognostic-perception, 
and,  the  ingredients  of  which  equal  sensible-stimuli,  with  the  coex- 
istent product  of  both  posited  as  conscious-being-universally-immedi- 
€ted,  i.  e.  living-aims-in-statified-remainder. 

Every  memorial-think  equals  an-anatoi^ic-whoh-filled-out-with-r^- 
made-particulars,  the  whole  of  which  equals  an  hypo  static-conception, 
and,  the  particulars  of  which  equal  mensible  animi,  with  the  sue- 
cessional  conduct  of  both  possessed  as  being -under  stood-individuallyf- 
recognized,  i.  e.  language-names-in-ratified-reminder. 

Conscious-being  and  Living- aims  mean  the  same,  as,  do  Being- 
understood  and  Language-names. 

As  the  Sum  varies  as  its  Factors,  so  the  Sum  of  all  and  EACH 
varies  as  all  and  each.  Antecedent  to  the  aspiration  of  ALL  and 
each  to  become  self  -distinguished,  all  and  each  were  one,  as  summed 
Subsequent  to  such  aspiration,  all  and  each  were  many,  as  summed. 
ALL  states  and  each  rates  their  sum. 

As  The-Sum  of  all,  Their-Sum,  as  the  quo  animo  of  ALL,  equals 
infinite-progression. 

As  The-Sum  of  each,  Their-Sum,  as  the  quoad  hoc  of  each,  equals 
definite-presence. 

As  aiming  all  their  self-distinguishment,  all  aim  to  change 
their  (sum)  quo-animo-of -infinite-progression  to  an  autognostic-b+- 
coming,  i.  e.  an  introspective-synthesis-of -conscious-being — an  out- 
reaching  hypothesis. 

As  naming  each  their  self-distinguishment,  each  names  as  chosh 
ing  their  (sum)  quoad-hoc-of -definite-presence  from  an  hypostatic-bu- 
passing,  i.  e.  a  retrospective-analysis-of -being-understood  —  a  baca- 
grasping  apotheosis. 

All  outreaching -hypothesis  (epiblastically)  turns  out  to  be  a 
prognosed  matter  of  speculative  subsequentiality,  i.  e.  an  experi- 
mental-essay. 

Each  backgrasping -apotheosis  (hypoblastically)  turns  in  to  be  o 
diagnosed  memory  of  apodictic  antecedents,  u  e.  an  experiential  assay. 

MOIETAL  FUNCTIONS  AND  SUM  FACULTY 

For  A-motion  and  E-motion,  the  moietal-f unctions  of  JE  -motion, 
(their  sum-faculty),  to  essay  their  A-motion  and  E-motion  functivi- 
ties  apart  from  iE-motion  (their  facultate  togetherness) ,  requires  that 
A-motion  and  E-motion,  contrary  to  their  antecedent  method,  operate 
away  from  instead  of  toward  uE-motion. 

The  undertaking,  above  defined,  clearly  contemplated  a  division 
of  labor,  for  how  could  the  moieties  of  a  sum  operate  apart  from  such 
sum,  except  by  a  dissolution  of  their  togetherness?  And  as  clearly 
contemplates  self-distinguishment,  for  how  would  the  moieties-of-a- 
sum  operate  apart  from  their  sum,  except  by  a  resolution  of  their 
apartnesses?  And,  as  clearly  contemplates  a  convision  of  labor,  for 
kow  should  the  moieties-of-a-sum  operate  apart  from  their  sum,  except 

15 


by  a  rejoinder  of  their  (a)  dissolved-togetherness,  and,  their  (b) 
resolved-apartnesses?  For,  as  their  dissolution  was  begun  (pur- 
posedly  and  proposedly)  by  power  of  a  common-aim  (or  means),  so 
their  resolution  will  continue  by  genius  of  a  common-mean,  and,  thus, 
their  rejoinder  must  end  (achievedly  and  composedly)  by  virtue  of  a 
common-name  (or  meaning). 

Beginning  their  essay  as  the  intropermeative  (chemical)  pr&- 
members  of  the  Logical  (holelike)  Faculty,  that,  as  constituted  by 
them,  contains  their  togetherness;  and,  ending  their  assay  as  the 
extravasated  (mechanical)  re-members  of  the  Rational  (wholelike) 
Facility,  that,  as  instituted  by  them,  contours  their  apartnesses;  as 
beginning,  they  find  their  essay  come  to  be  the  object  of,  and,  as  end- 
ing, they  find  their  assay  passing  as  being  the  subject  of,  Their-Com- 
mon-Mean,  the  genius  of  which  grasps  the  essay  of  all,  as  given  by 
means  of  sensible-stimulus,  or  what  the  essay  of  all  amounts  to  as 
perceived  by  me  (their  mean),  and,  grasps  the  assay  of  each,  as 
given  by  meanings  of  mensible-animus,  or  what  the  assay  of  each 
amounts  to  as  conceived  by  me  (their  mean),  and,  presto,  "the  invis- 
ible purpose  of  all  from  the  beginning,  as  proposed,  will  be  spnsibly 
eonscioussed,  because  of  the  perceived  essay  of  all  (the  ingredients), 
as  aimed,  and,  will  be  mensibly  understood  by  reason  of  the  conceived 
assay  of  each  (the  particulars),  as  named,  of  the  invigorous  achieve- 
ment of  each  at  the  ending,  as  composed." 

The  object-of-ALL  as  provided  to  me,  in  the  guise  of  A-motion, 
and,  as  intellectually  perceived  by  me,  called  "sensible-stimulus,"  equals 
The  Matter-of -Composed- A  chievement. 

The  sub  ject-of -each  as  confided  to  me,  in  the  guise  of  E-motion, 
and,  as  conscientiously  conceived  by  me,  called  "mensible-animus," 
equals  Memory-of-Proposed-Purpose. 

The-Matter-of-Composed-Achievement,  as  compiled  from  the  sen- 
sible notions  provided  to  me,  by  the  essayive  (universal)  aim  of 
all  (The  Atoms),  comes  to  be  the  object  that  the  perceptual  half  of 
me  assays. 

The  Memory-of-Proposed-Purpose,  as  complied  with  by  the  men- 
sible  notions  confided  to  me,  by  the  assayive  (individual)  name  of  EACH 
(The  Item),  passes  as  being  the  subject  that  the  conceptual  half  of 
me  essays. 

The  importance  of  me,  stands  expressed  by  the  first  command- 
ment; for  alone  through  me,  as  the  feeler  of  the  subjectified  essay  of 
all,  and,  as  such.  The-I-vent-of-ALL;  and,  only  beyond  me,  as  the 
seer  of  the  objectified  assay  of  each,  and,  as  such,  The-Eye-dam-of- 
EACH,  can  and  may  they,  by  con  vision  of  their  opposed  vocations, 
come  to  be,  as  essayed  by  all,  and  pass  as  being,  as  assayed  by  each, 
S elf '-Distinguished,  Q.  E.  D.,  for  in  me,  their  quo  anime  (as  all)  and 
t$xt  auoad  hoc  (as  eache),  meanly  meet  and  meetly  mean  their  identi- 
fied difference  of  vocation. 

ME,  the  anticipated-point  at  which  they  meanly  meet,  equals  the 
res  medHa  of  their  rejoinder  after  division  of  vocation*  and,  ME,  the 
participating-period  during  which  they  meetly  mean,  equals  the  res 
gestae  of  their  convision  after  rejoinder  of  vocation,  or,  respectively, 

If 


posited  as  The-Conscious-Being,  that  nexually  bridges  the  interval- 
created-by-their-contrapolaric-divisionment-gf -vocation,  and  possesses 
as  The-Being-Understood,  that  sexually  attends  the  contiguity-record- 
ed-by-their-protomolar-convisionment-of -vocation. 

Hence,  in  me,  as  come  to  be  "nought,"  or  come  to  be  (as  primarily 
self-distinguished)  Pure-Simplifications,  that,  as  Hegel  says:  "arte 
nothing,"  and  which  the  writer,  calls:  "unrecognized-immediationa- 
sensibly-objectified,"  i.  e.  Things-anonymously-perceived,  or  the  ga*~ 
troiiomic-chaos-with-which-intellectual-outreachment-finds-its-holenesd- 
filled-in,  all  correctly  rest,  as  the  "autognostic-substance,"  of  the  ENQ, 
or  composed  achievement  aimed  to. 

And,  thence,  in  me,  by  passing  as  "being,"  or  passing  as  being 
(as  ultimately  self-distinguished)  Sylleptic- Amplifications,  that,  as  the 
writer,  says:  "are  beings,"  and  which  equal:  "unimmediated-recog- 
nizances-mensibly-subjectified,"  i.  e.  Thinks-synonymously -conceived, 
or,  the  anatomic-cosmos-with-which-conscientious-backgraspment-find»- 
its-whoieness-filled-out,  each  discretely  continues,  as  the  "hypostatic- 
evidence"  of  the  BEGINNING,  or  proposed-purpose  named  from. 

"Unrecognized-immediations-sensibly-objectified,"  agrees  as  a 
phrase  with  Paul's  "substance  of  things  hoped-for." 

"Unimmediated-recognizances-mensibly-subjectified,"  agrees  as  a 
phrase  with  Paul's  "evidence  of  things  unseen." 

In  ME,  the  "substance  of  things  hoped  for,"  reduced  to  its 
simplest  autognosis,  equals  "matter." 

In  ME,  the  "evidence  of  things  unseen,"  elaborated  to  its  amplest 
hypostasis,  equals  "memory." 

Apostate  to  their  SUM,  the  moietal-functions  (ever  inalienable  J, 
of  such  sum  (ever  untranscendible),  at  the  beginning  of  (all)  their 
essay,  as  the  result  of  their  dissolution  come  to  be  "nought,"  or  pure- 
elements,  or  chaotic-gastronoms,  called:  matters-becoming;  and,  dur- 
ing the  ending  of  (each)  their  assay,  as  the  result  of  their  rejoinder 
passing  as  being  "beings,"  or  sylleptic-amplifications,  or  cosmic-ana- 
toms,  called:  memories-bypassing,  find  considerable  relief  at  being 
able  to  turn  from  the  "shame"  of  their  apostatic  private  practices  fjo 
the  savior-like  "sham"  of  their  hypostatic  public  pretences,  which 
explains  why  every  ME,  practices  the  "shames"  he  would  not,  and, 
pretends  the  "shams"  he  is  not;  for  in  so  far,  as  every  ME  has  a 
chemical  gastronomic-half,  he  stands  apostatic  and  practices  "shame"; 
and,  in  so  far,  as  every  ME  has  a  mechanical  anatomic-half,  he  stands 
hypostatic  and  pretends  "shams." 

As  apostatically  a  practicer  of  shame,  he  preys  according  to  his 
infelt  (ethnological)  yearning,  called  greed." 

As  hypostatically  a  pretender  of  sham,  he  prays  according  to  his 
outseen  (ethical)  learning,  called  "creed." 

To  destroy  me,  originally  The-Sum-of-their-apposed-vocation,  they 
all  aimed,  and  by  so  aiming  they  created  a  NOT-ME. 

To  restore  me,  ultimately  The-Mean-of-their-opposed-vocation&, 
they  each  named,  and  by  so  naming  they  scriptured  a  YET-ME. 

The  NOT-ME,  created  by  their  ostensible  destruction  of  ME, 
was   (as  purely  ingrediented  by   (all)   their  arrival  thereat),  an 

17 


objectified-hole-that-they-gastronomically-filled-in  because  of  which 
infillment  by  all,  such  NOT -ME,  gives  thanks  as  to  a  pre-divining 
provider  of  intuited  means,  or  a  di vine-pro vidence-that-my-hole- ( as- 
conscious-being  )  -inwardly-contains. 

The  YET-ME,  scriptured  by  their  apparent  restoration  of  ME, 
was  (as  sylleptically  particularized  by  (e'CH)  their  departure  thence 
during),  a  subjectified-ivhole-anatomically-filled-out.,  by  reason  of 
which  outfillment  by  each,  such  YET-ME,  takes  thinks  as  from  a 
re-humanizing  confider  of  innate  meanings,  or  a  human-confidence- 
that-my-whole-  (as-being-understood)  -outwardly-contour  s. 

My  NOT -ME,  as  "conscious-being,"  contains  all  that  comes  to 
be  contained;  hence,  my  NQT-ME,  as  "conscious-being,"  stands  un- 
transcendible  as  the  ultimate  bound  of  all. 

My  YET-ME,  as  "being-understood,"  contours  each  that  passes 
as  being  contoured;  thence,  my  YET-ME,  as  "being-understood," 
stands  untranscendible  as  the  primary  ground  of  EACH. 

Physic-Psychics  deals  (a)  with  Consciousness,  the  circumspherical 
Container  of  all  that  comes  to  be  sensibly -immediated,  and  (e)  with 
Understanding,  the  equicentric  contourer  of  each  that  passes  as  being 
fnensib  ly -recognized. 

Without  Consciousness,  the  uttermost  container  of  all  that  co- 
existently  comes  to  be  shown,  no  thing  comes  to  be  self -distinguished 
as  (universally)  aimed  by  ALL. 

Without  Understanding,  the  innermost  contourer  of  each  that 
successionally  passes  as  being,  no  think  passes  as  being  self -distin- 
guished as  (individually)  named  by  each. 

Between  Consciousness,  the  provider-of-ALL-sensible-means,  and, 
Understanding,  the  confider-of-EACH-mensible-meaning,  as  the-mean- 
vf-their-diversity-o] "-vocation,  arises  me. 

THE  HOL-OF-INTENT  AND  THE  WHOLE-OF  EXTENT 

Me,  equals  the  quo  animo  of  all,  i.  e.  the  hole-of-intent,  to  which 
All  aim  as  an  area  of  absence,  and  fill-in  (ingrediently)  by  their 
apparent  arrival  thereat.  ME  equals  an  introspected  point  of  antici- 
pated becoming. 

Me,  equals  the  quoad  hoc  of  each,  i.  e.  the  whole-of-extent,  from 
which  each  name  as  an  era  of  pre-sense,  and  fill-out  (particularizedly) 
by  their  csten?ible  departure  thenceduring.  ME  equals  a  retrospective 
period  of  participative  bypassing. 

As  me  arises  subsequent  to  their  diversity  of  vocation,  as  the 
Exponential-Mean-of-their-diversity-of-vocation,  i.  e.  as  the  result  of 
their  contact  as  diversities  of  vocation;  and,  as  to  ME,  so  instituted 
between  them,  they  play  the  roles  of  co-signifiers  (i.  e.  means  and 
meanings) ,  evident  stands  the  conclusion:  that  me,  before  contact  of 
them,  was  an  unknown-end  aimed  to  by  all  and  an  unshown-beginning 
named  from  by  each;  which  proves  that  me,  prior  to  contact,  was, 
despite  their  diversity  of  vocations,  the  non-entity  co-sought  by  both. 

Henee,  as  they  antecede  me,  as  pro-institutive  diversities,  that,  by 
contact,  create  me,  as  the  mean-of-their-diversities-of-vocation,  th* 
question  arises :    What  do  they  amount  to  prior  to  the  inauguration  of 

18 


such  diversity?     The  answer  to  which  query  runs  thus:     They  were 
constituents  of  the  sum-of-their-unity-of -vocation. 

Thence,  since  me,  equais:  The-Ratiocinative-Mean-of  their-diver- 
sity -of -vocations,  certainly  we,  equals:  The-lntelligent-Sum-of -their- 
unity-of -vocation. 

Me,  equals  we  (withdrawn  from  by  them  in  unity),  left  behind 
as  abandoned  by  its  intropermeative  constituents;  and,  we,  equals 
me  (returned  to  by  them  in  diversity)  right  ahead  as  restored  by  its 
extravasated  instituents. 

Me,  equals  the  heart  receiving  back  veinally  them  (each)  that 
the  same  heart  discharges  arterially  (as  all)  ;  and,  we,  equals  the 
heart  discharging  forth  arterially  them  (all),  that  the  same  heart 
receives  back  veinally  (as  each). 

The-Heart,  as  we,  equals:  MY-I-feeling-the-WILL-of-its-constitu- 
ent-ALL;  and,  as  me,  The-Heart,  equals:  MY -EYE -seeing-the- JUDG- 
MENT-of -its-instituent-E  A  CH. 

What  was  the  aim  of  the  essay  of  all,  as  abandoning  the  w»- 
side  of  The-Heart?     What  will  be  the  name  of  the  assay  of  each, 
as  restoring  the  ME-side  of  The-Heart?    Self-Distinguishment. 
CONSCIOUSNESS  AND  UNDERSTANDING 

By  way  of  Consciousness,  or  autognosis,  all  come  to  be  witnesses 
of  their  objectified  (canonized)  performance,  whencefrom,  Conscious- 
ness, may  be  defined,  as:  The-Chemical-Sum-Beholder-of-ALL-the-con- 
stituent-ingredients-ftlling-in-the-holeness-of-such-Sum-Beholder-with-- 
ALL-their-dissipating-aims-quo-animo. 

By  way  of  Understanding,  or  hypostasis,  each  passes  as  being 
counselors  of  their  subjectified  (organized)  agents,  whencefrom, 
Understanding,  may  be  designated,,  as:  The-Mechanical-Mean-By- 
holder-of-EACH-the-instituent-particulars-filling-out-the-wholeness-of- 
such-Mean-Byholder-with-EACH-their-conservated-names-quoad-hoc. 

Consciousness,  or  the  holeness  of  a  sum-beholder,  equals  the  gas- 
tronic-intaker-of-ALL,  and,  as  such,  reveals  the  nature-of-their-sum 
to  be  a  reclamatory  pursuer  and  consumer  of  all  that  essay  to  exhibit 
self-distinguished  apart  from  their  sum.  All  alteratedly  re-matter 
their  hole-sum. 

Understanding,  or  the  wholeness  of  a  mean  byholder,  equals  the 
anatomic-outmaker-of-EACH,  and,  as  such,  conceals  the  spirit-of '-their- 
sum  as  being  an  interrogatory  examiner  and  co-meaner  of  each  that 
assays  to  inhibit  self-distinguishment  apart  from  their-sum,  each 
alternately  re-member  their  whole-sum. 

Autognosis,  from  Gr.  to  auton,  together;  and  from  Gr.'  gnosis, 
knowledge  (i.  e.  to  know),  equals:  To-know-together-(as  witnessing)- 
their-ALL-motion-as-( coexistent) -per formers,  or  the  universal  phase 
of  self-distinguishment. 

Hypostasis,  from  Gr.  hypos,  under;  and  from  Gr.  stasis,  to  stand, 
equals;  to-under stand- (as  counseling  )-their-EACH -motion-as- (succes- 
sional) -agents,  or  the  individual  phase  of  self-distinguishment. 

The  universal-contributions-by-ALL  to  their  Autognois,  equals,  as 
perceived  (i.  e.  materializedly  beheld)  by  such  Autognosis,  Sensible- 
Stimulus. 

19 


V«.   ... 


The  individual-distributions-of-EACH  by  their  Hypostasis,  equals, 
as  conceived  (i.e.  memorializedly  byheld)  by  such  Hypostasis,  Men- 
dible- Animus. 

Every  Autognosis,  equals:  A-gastronomic-hole-filled-in-with-the- 
dissipating  -  aJM§  -  of  -ALL  -  essaying  -  experimentally  -  to-show  -  off-their- 
frlf-distinguishments-apart-from-their-sum,  or  their  conscious-con- 
tainer. 

Every  Hypostasis,  equals:  An-anatomic-whole-filled-out-with-the- 
Conservated-names-of-EACH-assaying-experientially-to-know-on-their- 
self-distinguishments-apart-from-their-sum,  or  their  understood  con- 
tour. 

ZERO  AND  HERO 

Consciousness,  bridges  the  interval  between  Autognosis  and  The- 
Motion-of-ALL,  i.e.  between  perception  and  sensible-stimulus,  or  be- 
tween intellectual-discernment  and  immediation-of -effects. 

Understanding,  attends  the  contiguity  between  Hypostasis  and 
The-Motion-of-EACH,  i.e.  between  conception  and  mensible-animus, 
or  between  conscientious-concernment  and  recognition-of -consequences. 

Having  destroyed  Their-Sum  by  dissolution,  they  (all  and  EACH) 
metamorphose  it  to  a  res-medial-interval,  the  contrapoles  of  which, 
equal:  all  and  each  self -distinguished  by  extremated-separation. 
Their-Sum  comes  to  be  their  ZERO  of  mean  difference. 

Having  restored  Their-Sum  by  re-solution,  they  (all  and  eachj 
metempsychose  it  to  a  res-gestael-contiguity,  the  protomolarities  of 
which,  equal:  all  and  each  self-distinguished  by  confluent-rejoinder. 
Their-Sum  passes  as  being  their  HERO  of  mean  identicality. 

all  plays  the  role  of  epiblast. 

each  plays  the  role  of  hypoblast. 

their-sum  plays  the  role  of  CIRCUMSPHERICAL  SPACE,  as 
Ostensibly  abandoned  by  all  and  each,  and  plays  the  role  of  equicen- 
tric-mesoblast,  as  apparently  restored  by  all  and  each. 

all  without  eachness  equals  boundless  expansion  of  freed  ele- 
ments, or  Living -Inclination. 

each  without  allness  equals  groundless  contraction  of  fixed 
eventualities,  or  Language-Explanation. 

Living-Inclination,  posits  for  its  moiety  of  Their-Sum,  that  area 
through  which  all  essayively  race  along  as  to  a  havenward-point-of- 
anticipated-becoming,  i.e.  as  through  that  notness,  called  Space,  i.e.  a 
holelike  excavation  that  all  ingredient,  as  contained  by  such  Hole, 
tnat  stands  to  such  ingredients  as  Matter  stands  to  achievement-pro- 
posed. 

Language-Explanation,  posesses  for  its  moiety  of  Their-Sum,  that 
era  beyond  which  each  assayively  trace  around  as  from  an  artlike- 
period-of-participative-bypassing,  i.e.  as  beyond  that  yetness,  called 
Eternity,  i.e.  a  wholelike  incubation  that  EACH  particularizes,  as  con- 
toured by  such  Whole,  that  stands  to  such  particulars  as  Memory 
stands  to  purpose-composed. 

Thus,  Their- Sum-abandoned-by-ALL,  comes  to  be  The-Hole-that- 
retakes-ALL-g astronomically,  as  recovering  its  outracing  allness; 
and,  so,  Their-Sum-restored-by-EACH,  passes  as  being  The-Whole-that- 

20 


remakes-E AC H -anatomically,   as   resovereigning  its  intracing  each- 

NESS. 

The-Hole-that-retakes-ALL-gastronomically,  comes  to  be  because 
of  its  retaken  ingredients,  a  container  refilled-in  with  the  aimed-to 
self-distinguishments  of  all,  which  aims,  as  autognostically  realizing, 
equal  that  massage-of -living -inclination,  called:  Life  per  se,  ever  a 
"conscious-being-refilled-in-by-retaken-ingredients." 

The-Whole-that-remakes-EACH-anatomically,  passes  as  being,  by 
reason  of  its  remade  particulars,  a  cantourer  refilled-out  with  the 
named-from  self-distinguishments  of  each,  which  names,  as  hyposta- 
tically  idealized,  equal  that  message-of -language-explanation,  called: 
Knowledge  inter  alia,  ever^a  "being-understood-refilled-out-by-remade- 
particulars." 

Conscious-being-refilled-in-by-retaken-ingredients,  equals:  A- 
Thinglike-Remainder-of-materialized-immediacy,  i.e.  a  bodylike  phy- 
siologium  pendente  lite. 

Being-understood-refilled-out-by-remade-particulars,  equals:  A- 
Thinklike-Reminder-of-memorialized-recognizance,  i.e.  a  soullike  psy- 
chorium  in  perpetuum. 

ROOT  AND  FRUIT 

The  root-acorn  (or  all-o-him),  by  intention,  essays  to  create  an 
auto-negatation  (posited-as-a-point-of -absence)  and  assays  as  creating  a 
lieu-affirmation  (possessed-as-a-period-of-pre-sense),  of  the  root-acorn 
(or  all-o-him) . 

And  the  lieu-affirmation,  or  the-extended-creature,  was  void  as 
without  form,  and  the  auto-negation,  or  the-intended-creator,  was 
valid  but  without  body. 

The  extended-creature-void-as-without-form,  was  the  prophecy-of- 
a-naturaX-organization-coming-to-be,  and,  the  intendedncreator-vaUd- 
but-without-body,  was  the  reminiscence-of-a-spiritual-canonization- 
passing -as-being . 

And  the  extended-creature-void-as-without-form,  was  not-him, 
and,  the  intended-creator-valid-as-without-body,  was  yet-him.  And 
the  not-him,,  was  a-univer sal-thing -coming '-to-be,  and,  the  yet-him, 
was  an-individual-thinkpassing-as-being. 

The  not-him,  or  the  creaturization  that  extended  from  the  root- 
acorn  (or  all-o-him),  was  the-daughter-oak,  or  the  auto-negation, 
to  which  all-o-him  essayively  aimed,  and  at  which,  as  apparently  ar- 
rived, the  root- acorn  (or  all-o-him)  rested,  as  come  to  be  a  matter- 
of -achievement,  with  which  he  was  well  satisfied? 

The  yet-him,  or  the  creatorization  that  intended  from  the  ex- 
tended daughter-oak  (or  not-him),  was  the-father-acorn,  now  con- 
ceptually working  within  the  daughter-oak,  as  the  prophecy  of  her 
motherhood,  whencefrom  comes  the  notions  of  "ancient-Father"  and 
l( enceinte-mother"   so   indelibly   stamped   on   the   pages   of  tradition. 

The  fruit-acorns  (or  each-o-them) ,  half  inceived  by  the  R0OT- 
ACORN  (or  all-o-him),  reminiscently  recall  "all-o-him"  as  the  "ancient- 
father;'  and,  half  conceived  by  the  daughter-oak  (or  not-him),  pro- 
phetically  initiate    (by,   Adamlike,    evolving   out    of   themselves   an 


c ... 


EVELIKE-OTHER,  and,  then  through  her,  as  coming  to  be  essentially 
involved,  pass   out   to   more   fruitage   via   their)    "enceinte-mother." 

From  All-of-him  via  not-him  dia  yet-him  to  each-o-them,  runs  the 
story. 

From  root-acorn  via  daughter-oak  dia  mother-oak  to  fruit-acorns, 
runs  the  gamut. 

Each-o-them  reminiscently  recalls  all-o-him  and  all-o-him  pro- 
phetically initiates  each-o-them.  All-o-him  and  each-o-them,  equal  the- 
contrapolar-extremes-of-an-experimental-interval  between  ancestral- 
intent  and  posterital-realization. 

Not-him,  equals  the  auto-negation,  or  the  holelike-form-of-an-end- 
hopefully-aimed-(i.e.  omtogeneratively-yearned)-to-by  all-o-him,  i.e.  a 
havenward-  (or  heavenward)  -point-of -anticipation,  apparently -filling  - 
in-with-all-o-him,  whencefrom,  the  holelike  form,  so  filled-in,  equals: 
Intellective-perception,  and,  all-o-him-as-so-filling  in,  equal:  an-autog- 
nostic-communion-of -sensible-ingredients,  gastronomically  integrated 
in  chemical  alltogetherness. 

Yet-him,  equals  the  lieu-affirmation,  or  the  wholelike-body-of-a- 
foeginning-faithfully-named-(i.e.  phylospecificatively  learned) -from  by 
each-o-them,  i.e.  an  artlike- (or  earthlike  )-period-of -participation, 
ostensibly -filled-out-ivith-each-of '-them,  whencefrom,  the  wholelike-body 
so  filled-out,  equals:  conscientious-conception,  and  each-of-them-so- 
filling-in,  equal :  an-hypostatic-resurrection-of-mensible-particulars, 
anatomically  segregated  in  mechanical  eachapartness. 

All-o-him,  ancestrally  prophecies,  by  his  imparted  initiative  to 
such  end,  the  ultimate-mensible-outcome-of -each-o-them  (as  predes- 
tinated during  their  beginning) ;  and,  Each-o-them,  posteritally  remi- 
niscenates,  by  his  derived  recall  from  such  beginning,  the  primary- 
income-of -all-o-him  (as  postobituated  at  their  ending). 

All-o-him,  equals  elohim,  i.e.  the-bachellor-seeking-fatherhood. 

Not-him,  equals  the-primaey-negation,  i.e.  the-g astronomic-hole, 
or  the  virgin  res  media. 

Yet-him,  equals  the-ultimate-affirmation,  i.e.  the-anatomic- 
whole,  or  the  foetal  res  gestae. 

Each-o-them,  equals  the-mean-kinds,  the-sonship-seeking-brother- 
hood. 

The-bachellor-seeking-f  atherhood,  as  aiming  to  an  end,  or  a  hole  of 
absence,  i.e.  an  excavation,  races  along  a  line-of -inclination  to  impart 
substance  to  a  hypothetical-place-of-rest  and  autognose  the  matters- 
evolved-by-his-essay,  i.e.  his  precaused-effects. 

The-sonship-seeking-brotherhood,  as  naming  from  a  beginning,  or 
a  whole  of  pre-sense,  i.e.  an  incubation,  traces  around  a  plane-of- 
explanation  as  deriving  evidence  from  an  apotheotwal-time-of -con- 
tinuation and  hypostasing  the  memories-involved-by-his-assay,  i.e.  his 
premotived-consequences. 

The  awaredness-of -effects,  as  autognosed  by  the  pre-causative-all- 
o-him,  and  the  bewaredness-of-consequences  as  hypostased  by  the  pre- 
motivated-each-o-them,  account,  respectively,  for  the  properties  seen  by 
the  gastronomic-beholder-of -means,  and,  for  the  proprieties  felt  by  the 
anatomic-byholder-of  -meanings. 

22 


The  hopeful-prey  er  seeks  to  be  supplied  with  his  current-bread  (or 
gastronomic-property) ;  the  faithful-prayer  seeks  to  be  protected  from 
current-temptation  (or  anatomic-impropriety). 

The  vain-cupidity  of  the  seeker-of -attractive-effects,  has  its  ob- 
verse parallel  in  the  naieve-stupidity  of  the  avovder-of-distractive- 
consequences. 

Looking  sees,  over  the  scanned  interval  between  it  and  its  essay- 
ively-aimed-to  (or  willed)  end,  the  not-me-object,  that  stops  its  en- 
deavorial  pro-autognostic  outreachment. 

Longing  feels,  under  the  skinned  contiguity  between  it  and  its 
assayively-named-from  (or  judged)  beginning,  the  yet-me-subject,  that 
starts  its  enthusiasm  post-hypostatic-backgraspment. 

The  not-me-object,  that  looking,  sees  over  beyond  a  scanned-* 
interval,  as  seen,  comes  to  an  universal-outside-me  (i.  e.  a  not-me)  and, 
the  yet-me-subject,  that  longing,  feels  under  through  a  skinned-con- 
tiguity,  as  felt,  passes  as  being  an-individual-inside-me  (i.e.  a  yet-me). 

ME,  therefore,  equals  a-mesoblastic-arachne-mater  between  an- 
epiblastic-dura-mater  (or  a  not  me)  and  a-hypoblastie-pia-mater  (or 
a  yet-me) . 

FACT  AND  ACT 

Every  act  evolves  a  fact. 

Every  fact  involves  an  act. 

Antecedent  to  its  realized  evolution,  every  fact,  equals  an  end, 
aimed  to  by  the-actor,  whose  act  equals  such  actor's  essay  to  bridge- 
the-interval  between  such  actor's-immediacy  and  such  aimed-to  end. 

Subsequent  to  its  idealized  involution,  every  act,  equals  a-begin- 
ning,  named  from  by  the-factor,  whose  fact  equals  such  factor's 
assay,  as  attending -the-contiguity  between  such  factor's-recognizance 
and  such  named-from  beginning. 

Subsequent  to  its  realized  evolution,  every  fact,  equals  a-matter- 
of-objectified-becoming,  i.e.  a  sensible-  perception,  of  which,  the  ex- 
pending-act  (in  the  role  of  sensible-stimulus),  autognostically  comes 
to  be  THE-EFFECTUALIZED  CAUSE. 

Antecedent  to  its  idealized  involution,  every  act,  equals  a-memory- 
of-subjectified-bypassing,  i.e.  a  mensible-conception,  of  which,  the 
impending- fact  (in  the  role  of  mensible-animus),  hypostatically  passes 
as  being  THE-CONSEQUENTIALIZED-MOTIVE. 

Every  beginning  evolves  an  end. 

Every  end  involves  a  beginning. 

The  expiring-prolineal-continuity  of  a-beginning,  provides  in- 
grediental-means  (or  gastronomic-content)  to  its  end-in-becoming,  by 
apparent  arrival  to  such  end-in-becoming. 

The  inspiring-collateral-continuity  of  the-end,  confides  particu- 
lar-meanings (or  anatomic-contour)  to  its  beginning-in-bypassing,  by 
ostensible  departure  from  such  beginning-in-bypassing. 

23 


<.: 


Let  every  end-in-becoming,  as  apparently  come  to  be  effectually 
realized  because  of  the  expiring-prolineal-continuity  of  a-beginning, 
and,  as  autognosed  by  all  its  senslble-gastronomic-ingredients,  equal: 
Definite-Presence,  or  what  every  beginning  amounts-to,  as  apparently 
self -distinguished,  at  its  end-in-becoming. 

Let  every  beginning-in-bypassing,  as  ostensibly  passing  as  being 
consequentially  idealized  by  reason  of  the  inspiring-collateral-contin- 
uity of  the-end,  and,  as  hypostased  by  each  of  its  mensible-anatomic- 
particulars,  equal:  Infinite-Progression,  or  what  every  end  amounts- 
to,  as  ostensibly  self-distinguished,  during  its  beginning-in-bypassing. 

Let  every  matter  be  void-as-without-form,  or  recognizance. 

Let  every  memory  be  valid-but-without-body,  or  immediacy. 


DEFINITIONS 

Life: — A-motion,  spontaneously  aiming  to  realize  the  end  of  its 
own  beginning,  at  which  end,  as  apparently  arriving,  A-motion,  real- 
izes its  own  auto-negation  as  a  matter-evolved-by-its-own-dissipating- 
essay,  which  realization,  as  materialized,  equals  consciousness-of-its- 
own-auto-negation-as-an-othemess,  i.e.  as  a  not-me. 

Knowledge: — E -motion,  simultaneously  naming  to  idealize  the 
beginning  of  its  own  end,  during  which  beginning,  as  ostensibly  depart- 
ing, E-motion,  idealizes  its  own  lieu  affirmation  as  a  memory-involved- 
by-its-own-conservating -assay,  which  idealization,  as  memorialized, 
equals  understanding-of-its-own-lieu-affirmation-as-a-sameness,  i.e.  as 
a  YET-ME. 

As  realizing  the  end  of  its  own  beginning,  A-motion,  materializes 
the  end  of  its  own  beginning,  i.e.  comes  to  be  conscious  of  the  end,  at 
which,  as  beginning,  A-motion,  experimentally  aims  and  evolvedly 
arrives.  A-motion,  thus  operates  between  its  own  causative  beginning 
and  its  effectualized  end,  as  the  res  media  of  its  contrapolar  vocation, 
i.e.  as  the  autognostic-renewer-of-its-own-progressive-evolution. 

As  idealizing  the  beginning  of  its  own  end,  E-motion,  memorial- 
izes the  beginning  of  its  own  end,  i.  e.  passes  as  being  the  under- 
stander  of  the  beginning,  during  which,  as  ending,  E-motion,  experien- 
tially  names  and  involvedly  departs.  E-motion,  thus  operates  between 
its  own  motived  end  and  its  consequential  beginning,  as  the  res  gestae 
of  its  protomolar  vocation,  i.e.  as  the  hypstatic-reviewer-of-its-pres- 
enced-involution. 


24 


<.:  ... 


COLUMBIA  UNIVERSITY  LIBRARIES 

This  book  is  due  on  the  date  indicated  below,  or  at  the 
expiration  of  a  definite  period  after  the  date  of  borrowing,  as 
provided  by  the  rules  of  the  Library  or  by  special  arrange- 
ment with  the  Librarian  in  charge.          , 

DATE  BORROWED 

DATE  DUE 

DATE  BORROWED 

DATE  DUE 

C28(ll4l)M100 

QP77  T33 

Thayer 

OS9??  7~33 


